Are Cell-Phones Dangerous? Essay

engineering is unmatched of the around powerful factors that affect our daily life and routine. As part of it we knell for the come up do itn and world extensive designd Cell- rings. A 2004 MIT survey state that stallular phone squ alls were ranked as the one invention that people hate the most, scarcely cannot live without. It beat out the alarm clock and the television. Cell-phones moderate turn over one of the most useful inventions around the world however, they have drastically and negatively touch on our conversation and privacy military personnelners. In addition, they have created an incredible amount of mortal accidents around the world collect to distracted drivers.Driving Accidents issuesAs a first issue regarding this remarkable invention we find the notable texting while driving. Victoria police Const. Ryan Wilson, a process of the barter division who chairs the B.C. Association of Chiefs of Police traffic safety committee, cited a case a few years a go where a woman was killed in what was believed to be a case of texting while driving. Police sought court orders to get her phone records, which showed that she was hence texting at the time of the crash (Jeff Bell 1). It is almost impossible to preserve your eyes focused on the road while giving attention to the screen of your cell phone. It makes your sight go off the highroad entirely for a couple of seconds, when anything mortal can happen.Apart from texting it is common for many people to call while hands argon on the wheels. But, is it considered as dangerous as texting? The study, by University of Utah researchers, adds to a growing body of evidence that conversing by phone while behind the wheel can be hazardous. Talking on a cell phone while driving is as dangerous as driving drunk, new federally funded research shows (Jeff Bell 1). Despite the fact that everybody drives with one hand on the wheel, the process of our brain focusing on the conversation limits our capaci ty to respond properly to any minimum situation on the street. A 2005 study published in the British Medical Journal looked at crash data for 456 cell phone subscribers in Perth, Australia, who had an auto accident that required medical attention. The study, which fundamentally confirmed a similar 1997 study conducted in Toronto, concluded that drivers talking on their phones were about quaternary times more(prenominal) likely to be involved in an accident than those who were not on the phone. other highly publicized 2006 study from the University of Utah concluded that drivers who talked on cell phones were as impaired as drivers who were intoxicated at the legal blood-alcohol limit of 0.08. The study, however, found that using hands-free devices did little to improve drivers performances (Nancy McVicar 1). The use of them has been so far the best and totally solution that diminish the risk of a mortal worldwide issue. It is not deniable that cell phones have caused several tra ffic deaths and injuries. As a matter of fact, either art or texting while driving is among the most dangerous activity around the world.Despite slightly studies have shown that hands-free devices reduces the risk, they do not entirely finish with the problem. Frank Drews, one of the Utah researchers who has published earlier studies screening drivers on the phone are at higher risk of accidents, give tongue to We have shown in old studies there is no difference between hand-held and hands-free. There is a more dangerous destiny when people are dialing the phone or searching for the cell phone in the briefcase on the billet beside them, but what distracts people when talking on a cell phone is the conversation, not holding the phone (Nancy McVicar 1). bulk film to star being conscious and profit technology for our benefit not for our death. discourse IssuesIn another subject, cell phones have revolutionarily transformed our way to communicate to other people. We used to be anxious to see our friends, our family, our partner etc. However, people are so attached to their devices that even the most important and delicate conversation is spoken by phone. And more than anything, we are discovering fitting how far and wide mind and body can be separated, because now we can be where we arent, no matter where we are, express Martin Miller, a reporter from Los Angeles Times (Martin Miller 1). Despite the fact that cell phones clearly make our languish relationships easier they completely destroy our closer ones. John Petersen, founder and president of the Arlington Institute, a future-oriented think tank in Arlington, Virginia. What it is done is to change our view of reality. You remember not so long ago when making a long-distance phone call was a big deal? You would say, Im calling long distance, and you were supposed to drop everything? Now it is not a big deal anymore to get a call from anywhere on the globe (Martin Miller 1). So, in fact not only our communication with close people is being jeopardized but the long distance treatment is also being affected.It is so easy to make long distances phone calls that we have stopped doing them. In spite of becoming every time easier to do them, we loose motivation and intrigue, which lead us to hesitate about the call and dedicate it for another moment. Besides the effect that cell phones has on any long and short relationship, there is a more concerning issue regarding communication, the face-to-face conversation. Cell phones are also reshaping our social habits and attitudes, say sociologists. According to Martin Miller, the takeout phones, depending on their usage, can by turns be a shield against loneliness or create isolation. This would be the case when you cannot really focus on what you are doing, or what are you talking about payable to the distraction that this portables create in us. Michael Zey, a sociologist at Montclair State University in refreshful Jersey said They can reduce the need to create bridges. It allows people to exclude the people who may be in front of them and to interact with people they already know who are someplace else (Martin Miller 2).We have reach so dependant on these devices that they have created an inner necessity to be in touch at any time with family and friends. Even though this might sound as a good thing, it is not. People are not calling other people constantly with little regard to the content of the conversation. A recent three-panel cartoon in the New Yorker jokes around with some cell phone users apparent need to always be on the phone. The first panel shows a businessman entering a rent talking on a cell phone with the caption, Im boarding the train. In the next, which shows the man on the train, he says, Im on the train. And in the last one, showing the cell phone user leaving, he says Im leaving the train (Martin Miller 2). The urge of having knowledge of everything that somebody else is doing is slowly killing our general communication with the outside world.I think people have become more dependent on being in constant touch with others, said Edward Tenner, author of the 1997 carry Why Things Bite Back Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences (Martin Miller 2). In general cell phones have changed negatively our close and far relationships. In addition, our face-to-face communication has also been drastically affected. In all of the cases they interrupt any situation happening at the moment and move your head to a whole other situation in another place. Cell phones and what is coming is what is driving planetaryization, says Petersen, a creator staff member of the National Security Council at the Reagan White House. He cited I think what were seeing is an almost biological evolution of the species. I think were building a global nervous system and brain (Martin Miller 3).Privacy IssuesMoving to our last but not to the lowest degree issue about cell-phones, we have a worldwide lost of privacy because of these modern devices. Technology has just exploded. Its so sophisticated now and its very easy to utilize these different technologies to keep tabs on a person and find out where theyre way out, said Gina Pfund, chief assistant prosecuting officer of the Domestic Violence Unit in Passaic County (Hannan Adely 1). How easy is to take your partners cell-phone and scroll downward(a) the text messages, e-mails and individualized contacts? This has become a habit for many people. Although it is extremely convenient to have all your information, addresses, pictures, among others inside one little piece of metal, it is extremely dangerous to have your intimate life registered in something that anybody can take and see. Therefore, people are not only searching into their partner cell phones but also buying small artifacts that can record and play back all you do with your phone.Hannan Adely from New Jersey Media Group Inc said The person watching o r listening is often a family member and frequently a suspicious or controlling partner. They have scanned Facebook pages, viewed online web-browsing histories, and examined cell phone records for proof. But some take it a step further, planting spyware on smart phones and computers (Gary Marx 1). Now our problems are not only cell phone but also the accessories that have been created for them. Even though Richard Drobnick, director of the Teaneck-based Mars & genus Venus Counseling Center, said some forms of prying can be justified because people need to know the truth, this new invention is more seen as a tragedy than a relieve. All of the above examples of information collection are perfectly legal.But the most troubling aspect of the problem for privacy advocates is that in many cases consumers dont immediately recognize these actions as invasions of privacy, said Gary T. Marx, a Californian lawyer (Gary Marx 1). He also empathized They might have a vague concern over certain te chnologies, but consumers often dont understand how technology is being used to gather, analyze, and distribute data. Even among more insightful users there is great contrariety about how to view new technologies, and consequently there is disagreement on what constitutes misuse (Gary Marx 1). Despite the ignorance that the world is having by thinking that lost of privacy because of cell phones is not an issue, our standard of conduct must go beyond what is legal if privacy as we know it is going to be maintained.ConclusionIn conclusion, cell phones might be considered as one of the most demanding device in our society however, the negative side of them is enormous. Mortal accidents, lost of communication and lost of privacy are concerning problems that people should be conscious of. Although some people are aware of the situation, the necessity to use cell phones is bigger than our rational mind. So one explanation for our result is that cell phones may be dangerous, stated Saurab h Bhargava, professor of University of Chicago economics (Walberg Matthew 2). They certainly are more dangerous than people think. If we continue to use portable phones the wrong way, death statistics will keep raising as well as our personal relationships will keep ending. Be a part of the future, not a problem to itWorks citedAdely, Hannan. cellular phone Spying Getting Easier for Abusers, Stalkers. The Record. 02 Jan 2012 A.1. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 25 Nov 2012.Bell, Jeff. Distracted Driving Blamed for Growing Number of Traffic Deaths. Times- Colonist. 29 Aug 2012 A.3. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 12 Nov 2012. Marx, Gary T. Privacy Lost. California Lawyer. Jan. 1999 48+. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 25 Nov 2012.McVicar, Nancy. Study Calling While Driving As Dangerous As Driving Drunk.Sun- Sentinel (Ft. Lauderdale, FL). 29 Jun 2006 n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 13 Nov 2012. Miller, Martin. Withdrawing into Our Cells. Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, CA). Sept. 19 2002 E1 +. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 18 Nov 2012. Walberg, Matthew. Is Driving, apply a Cellphone As Bad As Thought?. Chicago Tribune. 26 Mar 2012 1. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 12 Nov 2012.